‘Europe should evolve its carbon market, not dilute it,’ investors say

Europe should evolve its carbon market, not dilute it,’ investors say

Major Investor Coalition Calls for ETS Strengthening

Europe should evolve its carbon market – A coalition of 45 leading European investors, overseeing a combined €11.4 trillion in assets, has issued a cautionary message to EU leaders. The group asserts that for private capital to effectively support industrial decarbonisation, the Emissions Trading System (ETS)—the EU’s cornerstone carbon market—must retain its strength, consistency, and strategic importance. Their concerns are amplified as the bloc faces critical decisions on the ETS’s future during upcoming EU Council meetings on June 18 and 19. These discussions will determine whether the carbon market remains a vital tool for reducing emissions or risks being weakened by competing interests.

A Four-Year Plan for Fossil Fuel Transition

The European Commission has unveiled a comprehensive four-year strategy to reduce the EU’s reliance on fossil fuels. Central to this plan is the modernization of electricity grids, expansion of energy storage capabilities, and the accelerated deployment of renewable power sources. The initiative is projected to cost approximately €660 billion annually, with costs expected to rise to €695 billion by 2031–2040. This financial commitment underscores the EU’s determination to transition to a low-carbon economy, even as some member states push for changes to the ETS.

Industry Lobbying Threatens ETS Stability

Italy, Germany, and other EU nations have expressed support for dismantling the ETS, a move backed by intense lobbying from heavy industries. These sectors argue that the carbon market imposes undue costs on their operations, potentially harming industrial competitiveness. However, the investor coalition counters that the ETS is essential for maintaining a coherent approach to climate action. They emphasize that the system has already driven significant emissions reductions and remains a central pillar of the EU’s clean industrial strategy.

Among the letter’s signatories are prominent institutions such as Allianz SE, L&G Asset Management, the Church of England Pension Board, Erste Asset Management, Sampension, and Nordea Asset Management. The statement has also received backing from the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance, a group of global investors committed to sustainability. Together, they argue that the ETS should be adapted rather than undermined, ensuring it continues to serve as a reliable mechanism for achieving climate goals.

Proven Success of the ETS

Since 2005, emissions from electricity generation and industrial sectors under the ETS have dropped by roughly 50%. The system is projected to achieve a 62% reduction by 2030, with the power sector driving most of these cuts. Coal usage has declined steadily, while wind and solar energy generation have expanded rapidly, demonstrating the ETS’s effectiveness in incentivizing cleaner technologies.

The coalition highlights the ETS’s track record, noting that its market-based approach has already delivered substantial results. They stress that the power industry has been the primary driver of these reductions, but the ETS also provides a framework for other sectors to align with decarbonisation targets. This success, they argue, validates the system’s role in shaping the EU’s economic and environmental strategy.

Strategic Support, Not System Weakening

Investors insist that while heavy industries require targeted support to meet decarbonisation goals, the ETS should not be diluted. They point out that these sectors face unique challenges, including long asset lifetimes, high capital costs, and technological limitations. Instead of reducing carbon pricing, the coalition advocates for complementary measures such as subsidies, innovation grants, and tax incentives to ease the transition without compromising the ETS’s integrity.

Opponents of the ETS often claim that lowering carbon prices would bolster industrial competitiveness. However, the investors dispute this, arguing that the EU’s real challenges lie in structural issues like elevated electricity prices, grid inefficiencies, and limited access to affordable clean energy. These factors, they say, are more significant than the carbon market itself in hindering progress. Weakening the ETS, they warn, would fail to address these deeper problems and instead create uncertainty for investors.

Investor Confidence and Economic Signals

Walter Hatak, head of responsible investments at Erste Asset Management, highlights the importance of predictable policies for capital allocation. “Institutional investors rely on stable and long-term frameworks to make informed decisions,” he states. “A robust ETS aligns with our fiduciary responsibilities, shielding diversified portfolios from climate-related, energy-security, and policy transition risks. It also enhances clarity for investments in the real economy.”

The coalition warns that diluting the ETS could erode investor confidence, making it harder to attract funding for green initiatives. By maintaining its central role, the ETS sends a clear signal to businesses about the importance of reducing emissions, encouraging innovation and sustainable practices. This economic guidance is crucial for achieving the EU’s ambitious climate targets while ensuring a resilient and competitive industrial sector.

Political and Economic Balance

The debate over the ETS reflects a broader tension between environmental goals and economic concerns. While some countries prioritize short-term industrial stability, the investor group urges a long-term perspective. They argue that the ETS should evolve to better reflect current emissions realities and adapt to new challenges, but not be dismantled. This evolution might involve refining carbon pricing mechanisms, expanding coverage to additional sectors, or integrating the ETS with other policy tools.

For example, the ETS could be adjusted to account for regional disparities in energy costs or to incentivize low-carbon technologies more effectively. Such changes would preserve the system’s core function while addressing criticisms from industry stakeholders. The coalition’s message is clear: the ETS is not a barrier to growth but a catalyst for sustainable development. Its preservation is key to ensuring that Europe remains a leader in the global fight against climate change.

As the EU prepares to review the carbon market system on July 15, the investor coalition’s stance adds urgency to the debate. Their emphasis on maintaining the ETS’s strength underscores the belief that private capital is indispensable for achieving the bloc’s decarbonisation ambitions. Without a strong, predictable market, they fear that progress toward a greener economy will stall, leaving Europe vulnerable to both environmental and economic risks.

The call for an evolved ETS also highlights the need for political will. While the current system has shown its value, it requires continued support and refinement to meet future challenges. The coalition’s letter serves as a reminder that the ETS is more than a regulatory tool—it is an economic engine that drives investment and shapes the trajectory of Europe’s transition to a low-carbon future.

‘Partners and friends’: Trade and defence top of agenda at EU-South Korea summit

EU-South Korea Summit Focuses on Trade and Defence Collaboration

Partners and friends – Brussels hosted a significant EU-South Korea summit on Wednesday, where leaders emphasized strengthening ties through economic and security cooperation. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, European Council President Antonio Costa, and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung were present for the ceremonial signing of a new digital trade agreement, marking the 11th such meeting between the bloc and the Republic of Korea. This summit, held in a period of geopolitical uncertainty, highlighted the importance of mutual trust and partnership in navigating global challenges.

A Strategic Partnership in the Indo-Pacific

Speaking at the event, von der Leyen underscored South Korea’s role as a key ally in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. “Korea is one of Europe’s closest partners, both regionally and on the global stage,” she stated. “In today’s unpredictable world, partnerships like ours are essential for stability and shared progress.” The leaders also announced a joint statement reaffirming their commitment to fostering a strong, cooperative relationship. The document emphasized the value of multilateralism and the need for a predictable, rules-based economic system.

“We reaffirm our shared commitment to effective multilateralism, and to a stable and predictable rules-based free and fair economic order,” the joint statement read.

Trade Diversification Amid Global Tensions

With rising tensions between the EU and China, as well as the US, both sides are seeking to expand their trade networks. The recent digital trade agreement is a major step in this direction, following a landmark free trade deal signed over a decade ago. Since 2015, EU-South Korea trade has seen substantial growth, reaching approximately €124.25 billion in goods in 2025, according to the European Commission. This increase reflects the deepening economic integration between the two entities.

South Korea’s growing presence as an investor in Europe is another key focus. The country is now a major player in strategic industries such as batteries, electric vehicles, and semiconductors. For the EU, securing semiconductor supply chains and attracting further Korean investment are critical objectives. An EU official noted, “Korea has a global leadership position in semiconductors, making this a vital area for collaboration.”

Enhancing Digital Trade and Economic Security

The digital trade agreement, finalized at the summit, aims to reduce barriers to cross-border commerce and create legal certainty for businesses. It will streamline data flows while prohibiting the mandatory transfer of source code, ensuring flexibility for companies operating in both markets. Additionally, the deal seeks to establish robust consumer protection rules online, though each side will retain its own standards for personal data and privacy.

Economic security was a central theme, with leaders agreeing to launch a high-level dialogue on supply chain resilience. This initiative comes after China’s export restrictions on rare earths and other strategic materials, which are crucial for green technologies and the defense sector, placed pressure on global supply chains. The EU and South Korea also addressed challenges in the chip industry, which underpins automotive manufacturing and other key sectors.

Security Agreements and Regional Challenges

Despite progress on trade, a proposed security of information agreement did not gain final approval. EU officials had previously highlighted the deal as a means to enhance classified communication between Brussels and Seoul. “I hope the security of information agreement will be adopted soon, so Korea and the EU can exchange confidential data securely,” President Lee said. This would support joint industrial and research efforts, particularly in the defense and technology sectors.

The summit also addressed broader regional concerns, with North Korea and Russia identified as major issues. North Korea’s nuclear arsenal, though smaller than that of other nuclear powers, remains a point of concern for the EU. The bloc is prepared to share information on its support for Ukraine with South Korea, aligning with a shared stance against Russia’s ongoing conflict in the region. The joint statement condemned both Russia and North Korea for their role in sustaining aggressive actions against Ukraine, urging them to halt such activities immediately.

Building on Past Agreements

The new digital trade pact builds on the EU-South Korea Free Trade Agreement, which was ratified in 2011 and has since proven to be one of the bloc’s most successful economic partnerships. A senior EU official noted that the summit discussions will further explore this legacy, with nuclear non-proliferation emerging as a key topic. The agreement with South Korea in 2024 on security and defense cooperation also served as a foundation for current discussions, covering areas like maritime security, hybrid threats, and foreign information interference.

While the summit achieved several milestones, the absence of the security of information agreement leaves room for future negotiations. This deal, though not adopted, was seen as a potential tool to deepen collaboration between the EU and South Korea. The summit’s agenda underscored the strategic importance of the relationship, as both sides work to address challenges ranging from trade dynamics to global security.

Looking Ahead: A Path of Shared Goals

As the EU and South Korea move forward, the focus remains on leveraging their partnership to drive economic growth and security. The digital trade agreement is expected to serve as a catalyst for further collaboration, particularly in the technology sector. With South Korea’s investments in strategic industries, the EU aims to secure critical supply chains while fostering innovation.

Analysts suggest that the summit’s outcomes reflect a broader strategy to diversify economic alliances and reduce reliance on China and the US. The discussions on nuclear non-proliferation and supply chain resilience highlight the EU’s dual priorities: economic stability and geopolitical influence. South Korea’s commitment to maintaining its role as a key trading partner and investor is likely to shape future negotiations and policy decisions.

With the conclusion of the summit, both the EU and South Korea have reaffirmed their dedication to a strong, mutually beneficial relationship. The joint statement emphasized the importance of cooperation in an era of rapid technological change and shifting global power dynamics. As the two sides continue to align on trade and defense initiatives, the partnership is positioned to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of international relations and economic strategy in the Indo-Pacific region.

Video. Spain: Thousands gather as Pope Leo XIV reaches Barcelona

Spain: Thousands Gather as Pope Leo XIV Arrives in Barcelona

Spain – Upon landing at Barcelona-El Prat Airport at 12:45 PM local time, the Pope concluded his brief sojourn in Madrid and was met by a sea of supporters lining the streets near the cathedral. The arrival marked the beginning of a two-day visit, during which the Pontiff would engage with the city’s diverse populace through a mix of spiritual and public initiatives. The crowd, composed of both locals and international visitors, erupted in applause as the Pope stepped out of the aircraft, his presence igniting a sense of anticipation that had been building for days.

A Midday Reflection on Unity and Devotion

Following his arrival, Leo XIV participated in a midday prayer service that drew an overwhelming turnout. The ceremony, held in the historic cathedral, featured a blend of traditional chants and modern hymns, reflecting the city’s rich cultural tapestry. As the Pope addressed the congregation, he emphasized the importance of communal harmony, urging attendees to “rekindle the bonds that unite us in purpose and faith.” His words resonated deeply with those present, many of whom had traveled from distant regions to witness the event.

“We are here not only to pray, but to reaffirm our shared commitment to the values that sustain us,” Leo XIV declared, his voice carrying over the murmurs of the crowd. “Your patience, joy, and faith are the pillars of this city’s spirit, and I am honored to stand with you.”

Sagrada Familia: A Symbol of Spiritual Aspiration

One of the highlights of the visit was the blessing of the newly completed tower at the Sagrada Familia Basilica, a landmark that has captivated architects and pilgrims for over a century. This towering structure, which stands at an impressive height, is celebrated as the world’s tallest church, a testament to the vision of its designer, Antoni Gaudí. The Pope’s presence at the basilica underscored its significance as a beacon of religious devotion, while also highlighting the Vatican’s ongoing efforts to support Spain’s cultural and spiritual heritage.

The ceremony included a symbolic act of consecration, during which Leo XIV placed a hand on the tower’s spire, a gesture meant to invoke divine blessings. Attendees, many of whom had waited years for such an occasion, marveled at the architectural grandeur and the Pope’s heartfelt message. “This building is more than stone and steel; it is a prayer in the form of a cathedral,” he said, drawing applause from the gathered masses.

Public Engagement: Bridging Faith and Community

Barcelona’s program for the Pope’s visit extended beyond the cathedral, incorporating a range of public events designed to foster interaction between the Vatican and local communities. The midday service was just the first of several activities, with the second day featuring an evening vigil tailored for younger generations. This event, held at the city’s Olympic Stadium, aimed to create a more inclusive dialogue about faith in contemporary society. Organizers highlighted the importance of engaging youth, noting that “the future of the Church lies in the hands of those who will carry its message forward.”

The Pope’s itinerary also included informal meetings with community leaders, educators, and artists, underscoring his emphasis on dialogue and cultural exchange. These sessions provided a platform for discussing challenges such as secularism, youth unemployment, and the role of faith in public life. “We must adapt to the changing world while holding fast to our traditions,” he remarked during one such gathering, a sentiment that echoed through the halls of the cathedral and the vibrant streets of the city.

A Growing Hub for Religious Tourism

Leo XIV’s visit to Barcelona coincided with the city’s rising prominence as a destination for religious tourism. Known for its blend of history, art, and spirituality, Barcelona attracts millions of visitors annually, with landmarks like the Sagrada Familia and the Gothic Quarter drawing global attention. The Pope’s presence further solidified the city’s status as a spiritual epicenter, offering a unique opportunity for both tourists and residents to experience the depth of Catholic tradition.

Religious tourism has seen a surge in recent years, with many seeking immersive experiences that connect them to the faith. The Pope’s blessing of the Sagrada Familia tower, in particular, was expected to draw significant international media coverage and boost visitor numbers. “Barcelona has long been a place of inspiration,” a Vatican spokesperson noted, “and this visit will amplify its role as a symbol of hope and faith.”

The Road Ahead: Outreach Beyond Barcelona

As the Pope’s stay in Barcelona drew to a close, the Vatican’s focus turned to the Canary Islands, where Leo XIV was set to visit for two days. This leg of the journey would serve as a continuation of his mission to connect with different regions of Spain, each with its own distinct cultural identity. The Canary Islands, known for their natural beauty and warm climate, provided a contrasting backdrop to the urban fervor of Barcelona, offering a chance to engage with a community that has historically maintained strong ties to the Church.

Following his arrival in the Canary Islands, the Pope would participate in local traditions and ceremonies, reinforcing the Vatican’s commitment to outreach across Spain. “Our goal is to make the Church accessible to all, regardless of where they call home,” he stated, emphasizing the need for a unified approach to spiritual leadership. This strategy, he argued, would help bridge gaps between urban and rural populations, as well as between generations.

Legacy of a Papal Journey

Leo XIV’s first official trip to Spain was meticulously planned to leave a lasting impact on both the nation and the global Church. From the moment he set foot in Barcelona, the Pope’s interactions with the public and his speeches highlighted a desire to inspire and connect. His emphasis on unity, gratitude, and cultural dialogue aligned with broader Vatican initiatives to promote a more inclusive and dynamic faith.

The visit also served as a reminder of the Pope’s role as a unifying figure, someone who transcends borders and denominations to speak for the collective spiritual experience. As the final leg of the journey approached, officials anticipated that the trip would strengthen the Church’s presence in Spain and reaffirm its relevance in an increasingly diverse and modernized society.

For the people of Barcelona, the Pope’s presence was a moment of both celebration and reflection. It offered a chance to witness the intersection of faith, history, and progress, as the city continued to evolve while honoring its roots. “This visit is a gift to our community,” said a local resident, “and it reminds us of the enduring power of shared belief.” As the Pope prepared to depart, the echoes of his message lingered, promising to shape the city’s future for years to come.

‘No Lisbon without saints’: Popular Saints festivals in the capital

No Lisbon without saints: A Celebration of Culture and Community

No Lisbon without saints – As June unfolds, the city of Lisbon revives one of its most cherished traditions: the Santos Populares festivals. These vibrant celebrations, rooted in Catholic heritage, have become a cornerstone of the city’s cultural identity, drawing crowds to streets alive with music, festivity, and the shared joy of community. The events honor three saints—Saint Anthony, Saint John, and Saint Peter—each marking a distinct date in June, yet collectively embodying the spirit of Lisbon’s annual summer revelry.

The Heart of the Festivities

The Santos Populares are more than just seasonal gatherings; they are a living testament to the enduring traditions of Portuguese culture. Celebrated nationwide, these festivals take on unique character in different cities, with Lisbon standing out for its emphasis on Saint Anthony, the patron saint of the city. Locals, in particular, have an unwavering devotion to this figure, whose feast day on June 13th is often seen as the unofficial start of the festivities. The celebrations, while varied across regions, are united by their role in fostering social bonds and preserving cultural heritage.

“It’s a time of celebration, happiness and lots of socialising. Speaking for myself, but also for people I know, we talk about the Santos Populares all year round,” Leonardo Bordonhos shared with Euronews. “This is one of the traditions that defines Lisbon, the year and our social life. I can’t even imagine a reality in which the Santos Populares didn’t exist,” he added.

Maia Ribeiro, another local voice, echoed this sentiment, highlighting the festival’s place in national identity. “It is part of our identity as Portuguese people. When I was a child, I already used to come to the Santos Populares… there is no Lisbon without saints,” she noted. These reflections underscore the festivals’ significance as a unifying force, bridging generations and connecting communities through shared rituals.

A Guide to Lisbon’s Most Iconic Celebrations

With Saint Anthony’s day approaching, Euronews has compiled a list of the capital’s most vibrant Santos Populares events. Each celebration offers a unique blend of music, food, and public engagement, ensuring there’s something for everyone. The festivals are free to attend, making them accessible to all and emphasizing their role as a public cultural event.

One of the longest-standing festivals in Lisbon is the Santos Populares at the waterfront district of Santos. This event, which spans from June 13th to July 19th, is renowned for its energy and diversity. The River Tagus becomes a stage for live performances and street food stalls, where residents and tourists alike gather to enjoy the lively atmosphere. Acts such as Quim Barreiros, Maria Leal with Turb’Ó Baile, and Kiko is Hot bring a mix of genres to the celebrations, reflecting Lisbon’s eclectic music scene.

Another highlight is the Santos Populares in Campo Pequeno, a historic site that has hosted the festival since its inception. This year’s event runs for 16 days, featuring a lineup of musical acts and traditional dishes like grilled sardines and bifanas. The festival is not only a celebration of Saint Anthony but also a revival of Lisbon’s spirit, drawing visitors from across the city and beyond. Children are especially welcomed, with activities like bouncy castles and carousels ensuring the fun is inclusive for all ages.

Family-Friendly Vibes and Cultural Diversity

For families, the “Santos à Campolide” street party at Quinta do Zé Pinto offers a more relaxed, community-driven experience. This sprawling event, which concludes on June 13th, is celebrated for its welcoming environment and emphasis on togetherness. Live music from groups like Trio Clave and DJ Pietro fills the air, while food vendors serve traditional Portuguese fare. The party also features designated spaces for mingling, making it a hub for both locals and tourists to connect and celebrate.

In the Graça neighborhood, the Vila Berta festival has carved out a special place in Lisbon’s calendar. Part of the Festas de Lisboa program, this event marks its 15th anniversary with the theme “15 Years Getting the Party Started.” It remains a beloved tradition for residents, offering a traditional, family-oriented vibe. The festivities, which run until June 13th, feature daily entertainment from 6 pm, creating a space where music and laughter are the central attractions.

The Arraial Resiste in Mouraria is another standout, distinguished by its multicultural character and community focus. Held in Largo da Rosa, this event celebrates the neighborhood’s rich diversity, blending different cultural influences into its celebrations. The festivities, which continue until June 13th, are designed to encourage interaction between people of all backgrounds, transforming public spaces into places of unity and exchange.

The Grande Arraial de Belém, located in Parque dos Moinhos de Santana, is a relatively newer addition to the Santos Populares lineup. Now in its third year, this event has gained recognition for its inclusive approach and dynamic program. With activities catering to all age groups, it has become a reliable highlight on Lisbon’s summer festival calendar, ensuring its place as a must-attend event for both locals and visitors.

Tradition Meets Modernity

While the Santos Populares have deep historical roots, they continue to evolve, adapting to contemporary tastes without losing their cultural essence. The festivals are a bridge between past and present, where old customs meet new expressions. For instance, the music lineup includes both classic performers and emerging artists, ensuring the events remain relevant and engaging. Similarly, the integration of modern amenities—like food trucks and interactive installations—adds a fresh layer to the traditional experience.

The Santos Populares also serve as a platform for local artists and businesses. Stalls selling traditional foods, such as bifanas and grilled sardines, are complemented by vendors offering contemporary twists on classic recipes. This blend of old and new reflects Lisbon’s ability to honor its heritage while embracing innovation. The festivals have become a symbol of the city’s resilience and creativity, proving that tradition can thrive in a changing world.

As the sun sets over Lisbon’s streets, the Santos Populares remind us of the city’s soul. These events are not just about music and food; they are about connection, identity, and the joy of community. Whether through the bustling Campo Pequeno, the intimate Vila Berta, or the multicultural Arraial Resiste, each festival offers a unique glimpse into the heart of Lisbon. As Maia Ribeiro aptly put it, “It is part of our identity as Portuguese people.” And for those who have grown up in the city, the absence of these celebrations would feel like a void, a stark reminder of their irreplaceable role in shaping the city’s cultural landscape.

With its diverse range of events and strong community ties, Lisbon’s Santos Populares continue to be a highlight of the summer season. These festivals are more than just a time to enjoy music and food—they are a celebration of resilience, unity, and the enduring traditions that define a city and its people. As the days pass and the celebrations grow, it’s clear that the Santos Populares are more than a fleeting moment of festivity; they are a cornerstone of Lisbon’s identity, ensuring that the city remains vibrant and connected year after year.

Shaken, not ‘woke’: Idris Elba says that James Bond should ‘just be Bond’

Idris Elba Advocates for James Bond’s Timeless Identity: ‘Just Be Bond’

Shaken not woke – The search for the next James Bond continues to captivate global audiences, with fresh names emerging weekly as candidates to take over from Daniel Craig. For years, the British actor Idris Elba has stood out as a frequent contender for the iconic role, even before Craig’s final film, No Time To Die, wrapped in 2021. Despite his widespread acclaim and a career spanning decades, Elba has consistently brushed aside speculation that he might return to the role. Now, in a recent interview with British GQ, the 53-year-old star of Luther has firmly closed the door on such discussions, emphasizing that the character of Bond should remain rooted in its original essence.

Revisiting the Legacy of Ian Fleming’s Creation

Elba’s latest comments align with his long-standing belief that James Bond should not be reimagined to the point of losing his core identity. “Bond is written how he was written for a reason,” he stated, underscoring the importance of fidelity to Fleming’s vision. This perspective has sparked debate, particularly as modern audiences increasingly demand representation and diversity in entertainment. Elba, however, argues that the franchise should prioritize escapism over political correctness, a stance he has reiterated in various public forums. “You’ve got to be pure to what it is: escapism. Don’t try and answer the world’s taste. Just be Bond,” he said, reinforcing his view that the character’s timeless appeal lies in its simplicity and universality.

Elba’s remarks also touch on the potential cultural reception of a Black male Bond. While he acknowledges the global reach of the franchise, he suggests that certain international markets may resist the idea of casting someone of color in the role. “I think, in realistic terms, some markets just don’t go for that,” he explained. “Bond is big all over the world. And [audiences] won’t [all] go for a Black male, an African male, playing Bond. That’s not what they like in their culture. Period.” This statement reflects a nuanced take on the balance between tradition and modernization in the Bond series, highlighting how the character has evolved yet retained its status as a cultural icon.

A Shift in Perspective: From Speculation to Definitive Stance

Elba’s recent comments echo his earlier frustrations with the role’s association with race. During a segment on the SmartLess podcast, hosted by Jason Bateman, Sean Hayes, and Will Arnett, he described the offer to play Bond as “the pinnacle” of his career. However, he also criticized those who transformed the opportunity into a divisive issue. “Those that weren’t happy about the idea made the whole thing disgusting and off-putting, because it became about race. It became about nonsense and I got the brunt of it,” he said, capturing the emotional weight of his stance.

Elba’s argument is not without merit. The Bond franchise, while evolving, has always thrived on its ability to transcend cultural boundaries. From Sean Connery’s suave British charm to Roger Moore’s flamboyant flair, the character has been a global phenomenon. By advocating for a return to Fleming’s original blueprint, Elba positions himself as a guardian of the franchise’s legacy. Yet his remarks also invite questions about how the series can adapt to contemporary values without compromising its essence.

The Franchise’s Reboot and New Talent Pool

As the James Bond reboot under Amazon MGM gains momentum, the casting process has taken on new significance. Veteran casting director Nina Gold has joined the project, working alongside director Denis Villeneuve and screenwriter Steven Knight. This new team has been tasked with selecting an actor who can embody the spirit of Bond while appealing to modern sensibilities. Among the names frequently mentioned as frontrunners are Tom Francis, Callum Turner, Jacob Elordi, Jack Lowden, and Louis Partridge—each bringing a unique interpretation to the role.

Elba’s insistence on traditional casting contrasts with the broader trend of diversifying iconic roles. His comments reflect a growing divide in opinions about how to modernize classic franchises. While some argue that inclusivity should be central to Bond’s evolution, others, like Elba, believe the character’s power stems from its adherence to a timeless formula. “Bond is so unrealistic, so a hint of reality is good, but let’s not try and make it woke,” he said, highlighting his belief in maintaining the character’s flair for the dramatic.

Elba’s perspective resonates with those who feel the Bond series has already undergone enough changes. The franchise has previously explored different eras and settings, from the Cold War to the digital age. However, the notion of redefining Bond’s identity through race or social issues has sparked controversy. Elba’s assertion that audiences “won’t [all] go for a Black male” playing Bond suggests a pragmatic approach to the role’s global appeal. Yet it also raises the question of whether the series can remain relevant without embracing contemporary themes.

Despite his current reservations, Elba’s legacy in the Bond universe remains significant. His portrayal of the superspy in earlier discussions captured the imagination of fans and critics alike, even if he ultimately chose not to take the role. The actor’s comments now provide a framework for understanding the challenges of casting Bond in a rapidly changing cultural landscape. By advocating for a return to the original character, Elba ensures that the franchise’s identity remains intact, even as new talents are brought into the spotlight.

The ongoing search for the next Bond underscores the character’s enduring appeal. While the franchise faces pressure to reflect modern values, its foundation lies in the allure of a British secret agent who is both suave and daring. Elba’s insistence that “the franchise should not stray too far from Ian Fleming’s original character” highlights the delicate balance between innovation and tradition. His remarks also serve as a reminder that the Bond series is more than just a movie—it is a cultural touchstone that has shaped global entertainment for decades.

As the reboot progresses, the debate over Bond’s identity will likely continue. Elba’s voice adds a compelling dimension to this conversation, offering a perspective rooted in both artistry and audience expectations. Whether the new Bond will embody the same spirit as his predecessors or introduce fresh elements remains to be seen. But for now, Elba’s position that “James Bond should just be Bond” provides a clear benchmark for the franchise’s future direction.

Elba’s arguments are not just about the character’s image—they are about the broader implications of casting choices in global cinema. His comments challenge the notion that diversity must come at the expense of tradition, while also acknowledging the role of cultural context in shaping audience preferences. As the search for the next Bond moves forward, the question of what defines the character will remain central to its evolution. For Elba, the answer lies in preserving the legacy of Ian Fleming, even as the world around him continues to change.

In an era where franchises are constantly redefined to reflect new social narratives, Elba’s stance serves as a counterpoint. His belief that Bond should remain “just Bond” is a call to uphold the character’s original charm, ensuring that his appeal endures across generations. Whether this approach will resonate with modern viewers or spark further debate remains uncertain, but Elba’s voice is a powerful reminder of the role’s cultural significance. As the reboot unfolds, the question of how to honor Bond’s legacy while embracing the present will continue to shape the future of the series.

Luxury for less: Where to find the best-value five-star hotels in Europe

Travelers fall into two distinct categories: those who prioritize budget over comfort and those who demand nothing short of five-star indulgence. For the latter group, Hotels.com has uncovered a surprising solution—affordable luxury without compromising on quality. Their 2026 Hotel Price Index analysis highlights cities where premium stays are significantly cheaper than expected, with many European destinations leading the way.

Luxury for less – Contrary to popular belief, five-star accommodations can be found at surprisingly reasonable prices. According to the latest report, the most cost-effective city for a high-end stay globally is Nha Trang, Vietnam, offering rooms for just €81 per night. However, the report also reveals that eight of the top 10 cities with the best value for luxury travel are located in Europe, making it a prime destination for budget-conscious high-end seekers.

Spain’s Zaragoza emerges as the leading European city for affordable five-star options, with average nightly rates of €140. This city, known as the capital of the Aragon region, is the fourth-largest in Spain but remains relatively untouched by the over-tourism trend affecting other major European hubs. Its rich cultural heritage is evident in the UNESCO-recognized Mudéjar architecture, which blends Islamic and Christian design elements. Highlights include the Aljafería Palace, a stunning 11th-century fortress, and the Cathedral Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar, which showcases intricate Gothic details. Additionally, Zaragoza has become a hidden gem for chocolate enthusiasts, with a historical connection to cacao dating back to the time when monks first experimented with it in Europe. A Chocopass tour allows visitors to delve into this sweet legacy.

Further down the list, Wrocław in Poland offers similar value, with stays averaging €140. The city’s Old Town, enclosed by a historic moat, is a treasure trove of museums and monuments. Among its notable sites is the UNESCO-listed Centennial Hall, an architectural marvel that hosts cultural events and exhibitions. While not as well-known as its neighboring capitals, Wrocław provides a unique blend of medieval charm and modern amenities at a fraction of the usual cost.

Albania’s capital, Tirana, is another standout. Despite the attention often directed toward its coastal regions, the city itself offers a compelling mix of history and culture for around €150 per night. Landmarks such as the National History Museum and the Bunk’Art museums, which showcase life under Enver Hoxha’s regime, make it a must-visit for those seeking both affordability and depth in their travel experience.

Latvia’s capital, Riga, rounds out the European list with average five-star rates of €150. The city is renowned for its vibrant Art Nouveau architecture, a UNESCO-protected legacy that adorns its streets. Visitors can also explore Riga’s thriving craft beer scene, which has gained international recognition in recent years. The combination of historic sites and contemporary attractions makes it a prime destination for travelers looking to balance quality and cost.

Meanwhile, Croatia’s capital, Zagreb, offers a luxurious stay for €150 per night. This city, often overshadowed by its coastal counterparts, provides a blend of cultural landmarks and relaxed pace. Highlights include Saint Mark’s Church, an iconic Baroque structure, and the Lotrščak Tower, where visitors can hear the noon cannon. The Museum of Broken Relationships adds a touch of modern storytelling to Zagreb’s historical offerings.

Bulgaria’s capital, Sofia, is another hidden opportunity, with five-star hotels averaging €157. Beyond its cultural attractions, the city is a gateway to Roman ruins and offers access to skiing facilities in the surrounding mountains. The combination of historical depth and seasonal activities makes Sofia a versatile choice for those seeking value without sacrificing comfort.

Greece’s Heraklion, on Crete, is also highlighted in the report with average rates of €157 per night. While the country is synonymous with sun-soaked beaches and ancient ruins, Heraklion provides a more affordable alternative to Athens and other major cities. Its proximity to archaeological sites and coastal vistas makes it an excellent option for those desiring a luxurious Greek experience without the high price tag.

The top ten list concludes with Estonia’s Tallinn, where five-star stays cost around €163 per night. This Baltic city is a UNESCO site, boasting well-preserved medieval architecture and a picturesque Old Town. The Seaplane Harbour, now transformed into a maritime museum, and the Song Festival Grounds offer a glimpse into Estonia’s rich heritage and vibrant music scene.

Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic completes the global list, with stays priced at €163. While it’s a popular destination for Caribbean vacations, the city’s affordability for luxury accommodations makes it a competitive option compared to other tropical spots.

Smart Booking Strategies Save Big

For travelers who are willing to adjust their schedules, significant savings are possible. Last-minute bookings—those made within zero to seven days of arrival—can yield up to 26% off compared to reservations made over four months in advance. This trend underscores the importance of flexibility in planning, as even a shift in travel dates can result in substantial cost reductions.

One of the most effective ways to cut costs is by starting your stay on a Sunday instead of a Saturday, which can save an average of 14%. Additionally, traveling during the off-season is a proven method to access lower prices, with January identified as the cheapest month of the year. These insights from Hotels.com’s data encourage travelers to rethink their booking habits and take advantage of price fluctuations.

“With rising travel costs this summer, hotel prices are where real savings can be found,” noted Melanie Fish, a travel expert and spokesperson for Hotels.com. “Travellers are becoming more strategic, leveraging last-minute deals, choosing Sunday arrivals, and exploring destinations beyond the U.K. where five-star accommodations deliver exceptional value.”

The report also emphasizes that while fuel prices dominate summer discussions, hotel costs remain a critical area for budget adjustments. By embracing these strategies—whether it’s booking closer to the date or opting for less popular travel times—travelers can maximize their spending power without compromising on the quality of their stay. Europe, with its diverse range of affordable luxury options, proves that five-star experiences can be tailored to fit a variety of budgets and preferences.

Von der Leyen’s AI envoy pick draws conflict of interest questions

Von der Leyen’s AI Envoy Appointment Sparks Transparency Debate

Von der Leyen s AI envoy – European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s selection of Jim Hagemann Snabe as the EU’s inaugural special envoy for industrial AI has ignited a wave of scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest. A coalition of 41 progressive members of the European Parliament (MEPs) has questioned the decision, highlighting concerns that the appointee’s ties to Siemens—a German industrial powerhouse—may compromise the impartiality of EU policy on artificial intelligence.

High-Level Role for AI Advocacy

In late May, Euronews disclosed the Commission’s plans to establish a new position dedicated to advancing industrial AI strategies. The role was designed to steer the EU’s approach in this rapidly evolving field, though specifics about its responsibilities and selection process were still being finalized. Last week, the Commission finalized the appointment of Jim Hagemann Snabe, a Danish entrepreneur and Siemens chairman, to serve as the special envoy. His mandate will focus on accelerating AI integration across European industries, with the goal of fostering innovation and economic growth.

The choice has drawn sharp criticism, as MEPs argue that Snabe’s corporate affiliations create an imbalance in influence. The European Parliament’s progressive bloc has emphasized that Siemens, a key player in von der Leyen’s home country, may have undue sway over AI policy decisions. This has led to demands for greater transparency, with lawmakers insisting that the Commission should outline the criteria for selecting the envoy and clarify how conflicts of interest will be managed.

Questions Over Conflict of Interest Rules

A core grievance among the MEPs centers on the Commission’s internal guidelines for special advisers. These rules mandate that officials avoid situations where their personal or professional interests could override the public good. The group led by Brando Benifei, a prominent S&D MEP from Italy, has raised a critical inquiry: “Will the Commission publish the mandate, selection process, declaration of interests, and full conflict of interest assessment for this appointment?” The question, backed by 40 other lawmakers, underscores the need for accountability.

“What safeguards, recusals, and transparency obligations will prevent privileged access and undue influence by one industrial actor over EU AI policy?”

The MEPs further argue that Siemens’ current stance on AI legislation may not align with the broader interests of Europe’s industrial landscape. They point out that the company has historically advocated for regulatory frameworks that favor large enterprises, potentially at the expense of smaller businesses, start-ups, workers, and consumers. “The interests of one incumbent company cannot be equated with the interests of Europe’s diverse industrial ecosystem,” the lawmakers stated, stressing the importance of inclusive policymaking.

Despite these concerns, the Commission has defended its decision, asserting that Snabe’s role as an envoy is unpaid and will last until 31 March 2027. It also claims that he has agreed to pause his involvement with advisory boards for Google Cloud and C3.ai, an enterprise AI firm, during his tenure. However, some critics remain skeptical, noting that Siemens’ influence during the EU AI Act’s drafting process has already been a point of contention.

Previous Controversies and Broader Patterns

This is not the first time von der Leyen has faced backlash over high-level appointments. In 2024, she sparked a political firestorm by naming Markus Pieper, an MEP from her own group, as the SME representative in a well-compensated role. The decision drew accusations of favoritism, prompting her to withdraw the nomination after pressure from fellow lawmakers.

Von der Leyen’s situation echoes past instances where EU leadership has been criticized for perceived conflicts of interest. In 2015, the EU Ombudsman uncovered similar issues in the appointment of Edmund Stoiber, a German politician, as a special adviser to Jean-Claude Juncker. The ombudsman reported that the Commission had not adequately addressed concerns about Stoiber’s ties to industrial stakeholders, raising questions about the consistency of its conflict-of-interest policies.

Commission’s Defense and Policy Justification

Thomas Regnier, the Commission’s spokesperson for digital policy, has reiterated support for the AI Act, stating that the envoy’s role is to “advocate for innovation” and not to “represent specific corporate interests.” He emphasized that the special adviser will act as an independent advocate, ensuring that the EU remains at the forefront of AI development. However, critics argue that the absence of detailed safeguards undermines this claim.

While the Commission has stated that it has implemented measures to mitigate conflicts of interest, it has not specified what these measures entail. This lack of clarity has fueled speculation about whether the envoy’s corporate connections will affect the EU’s approach to regulating AI. The MEPs have called for a public declaration of interests and a comprehensive conflict-of-interest report to address these concerns.

The debate highlights a growing divide between proponents of rapid industrial AI adoption and advocates for balanced policymaking. Supporters of the envoy argue that Snabe’s expertise and business acumen will help the EU navigate the complexities of AI implementation. They contend that his experience with Siemens, a leader in industrial automation, positions him to provide valuable insights into how AI can enhance productivity and competitiveness.

Implications for EU AI Strategy

The controversy surrounding Snabe’s appointment reflects broader tensions in shaping the EU’s AI strategy. As the bloc seeks to position itself as a global leader in technology, the question of who should guide the policy has become a focal point of political discourse. The envoy’s role is expected to influence how the EU supports AI research, infrastructure, and workforce training, making the selection process a critical step in the agenda.

Some MEPs have warned that without transparent guidelines, the EU risks adopting a top-down approach that prioritizes corporate interests over public welfare. They argue that the AI Act, which aims to establish ethical and regulatory standards for AI, could be undermined if the envoy’s corporate background leads to favoritism. Others, however, believe that the role is necessary to bridge the gap between policy and industry, ensuring that the EU’s strategies are both practical and forward-looking.

As the debate continues, the Commission faces pressure to demonstrate that its selection process is free from bias. The upcoming conflict-of-interest assessment will be closely watched, with lawmakers and civil society groups eager to see whether the EU can maintain its commitment to impartial governance in an increasingly complex technological landscape. The outcome of this scrutiny could shape not only the envoy’s role but also the future of EU AI policy as a whole.

The appointment of Jim Hagemann Snabe marks a pivotal moment in the EU’s efforts to harness AI for industrial growth. While his background in Siemens offers a wealth of experience, the challenge lies in ensuring that his influence remains aligned with the collective interests of the EU’s diverse stakeholders. The Commission’s response to these concerns will serve as a test of its ability to balance corporate expertise with democratic accountability in the age of artificial intelligence.

US puts Alibaba, BYD and Baidu on Chinese military blacklist

US Department of Defense Adds Alibaba, BYD, and Baidu to Chinese Military-Linked Companies List

US puts Alibaba BYD and Baidu – The Pentagon has expanded its list of Chinese entities deemed connected to the military, incorporating Alibaba, BYD, and Baidu into the designation. This move restricts their access to US defense contracts, marking a substantial increase in the number of companies under scrutiny. As of Monday, the list now comprises 188 entities, up from 134 the previous year. Notably, the updated roster includes prominent non-state-owned firms that were not traditionally linked to defense or security operations, underscoring growing concerns in Washington about Beijing’s use of civilian enterprises to bolster its military capabilities.

Expanded Designation Reflects Strategic Concerns

The list, established through a congressional mandate in 2021, identifies companies with ties to the Chinese military apparatus, extending beyond those directly controlled by security forces. The Pentagon now considers firms that contribute to the country’s defense industrial base as potential targets. This shift highlights the administration’s focus on preventing China from leveraging its technological advancements for military advantage. The inclusion of Alibaba, BYD, and Baidu exemplifies the broader strategy to target companies that, while primarily engaged in civilian sectors, may indirectly support military objectives.

Alibaba, a global tech giant, is now listed due to its connection to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. The Pentagon cited this affiliation as evidence of the company’s role in enhancing China’s defense capabilities. Similarly, BYD and Baidu were added for their ties to the same ministry, which oversees technology and industrial policies. These additions signal a more comprehensive approach to screening firms for potential military ties, even if they operate in non-defense areas.

Reactions and Implications for US Businesses

Following the list’s release, the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party labeled it a “warning to American businesses, all levels of government, and the American people.” The committee emphasized that companies on the list should be delisted from US exchanges and that no American firms should engage with them, lest they aid China’s military growth. This statement has intensified debates over the balance between economic collaboration and national security.

Alibaba and Baidu have responded to the designation, asserting that their involvement with the Chinese military is minimal. In a statement, Alibaba clarified,

“Alibaba is not a Chinese military company nor part of any military-civil fusion strategy.”

Baidu, which has diversified into artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicle technology, dismissed the claim as “entirely baseless.” The e-commerce giant highlighted its commitment to civilian innovation, while Baidu pointed to its separate initiatives in emerging technologies as proof of its non-military focus.

The inclusion of these firms also raises questions about the broader impact on the tech sector. Companies like DJI, a major drone manufacturer, were already on the list, but the new additions demonstrate the Pentagon’s intent to widen its net. This expansion may affect international supply chains and influence partnerships between US firms and Chinese counterparts, creating uncertainty for businesses operating in both markets.

Trump’s Comments and Industry Reactions

President Donald Trump had previously expressed openness to Chinese automakers such as BYD, suggesting that their presence in the US could be beneficial. However, many lawmakers have since advocated for a ban on Chinese electric vehicles, citing concerns over trade imbalances and technological dependence. This contrast between Trump’s stance and current legislative priorities underscores the evolving nature of US policy toward China.

Among the new additions is Unitree, a robotics company whose robots gained attention after captivating Simon Cowell on NBC’s America’s Got Talent. The Pentagon noted that Unitree’s designation as a small or medium-sized enterprise enabled it to receive strategic support from the Chinese government. This assistance, the department argued, allowed the firm to develop cutting-edge technology that could be repurposed for military applications. Such cases illustrate how the list aims to intercept innovations before they are integrated into defense systems.

Beijing has criticized the US actions as an overreach, accusing Washington of stretching the definition of national security. The Chinese Embassy stated that Chinese companies comply with local regulations and that the designation is discriminatory. “The US should stop its wrong practice and create a fair, just and non-discriminatory environment for Chinese companies,” the embassy asserted. This response highlights the tension between the two nations, with Beijing framing the list as an attempt to stifle China’s economic progress.

Broader Context and Future Outlook

The expansion of the list reflects a strategic effort to isolate China’s military-industrial complex from civilian enterprises. By targeting firms in the tech sector, the Pentagon aims to disrupt the flow of advanced technologies that could accelerate China’s military modernization. This approach aligns with broader measures, including export controls and investment restrictions, to limit China’s access to critical US innovations.

While the designation may impact the companies’ reputations, it does not necessarily halt their operations in the US. However, the risk of further restrictions and reputational damage remains significant. The list also serves as a symbolic message to other nations, encouraging them to scrutinize their partnerships with Chinese firms. This could lead to a ripple effect, influencing international trade agreements and technology transfers.

As the US continues to refine its strategy, the inclusion of Alibaba, BYD, and Baidu underscores the growing emphasis on supply chain security. The decision to list these companies reflects a shift in focus from direct military ownership to indirect contributions to the defense sector. This nuanced approach allows the Pentagon to target a wider range of entities, including those that may operate in seemingly unrelated fields.

The situation highlights the complexity of global trade in the context of geopolitical rivalry. While the US seeks to protect its technological edge, China’s ability to integrate civilian advancements into its military infrastructure remains a key concern. The ongoing debate between the two nations may shape the future of international collaboration, particularly in the tech industry. For now, the updated list stands as a testament to the Pentagon’s commitment to safeguarding national security through targeted economic measures.

Airbus-led group proposes fighter jet alternative after French-German project fails

Airbus led group proposes fighter jet alternative – Following the termination of a prominent Franco-German defense collaboration, Airbus has spearheaded a new alliance to design a cutting-edge fighter jet, according to a statement shared with the AFP news agency on Tuesday. The decision to pivot stems from months of tensions between France and Germany, culminating in the end of their joint warplane initiative. This shift marks a significant development in European aerospace strategy as the two nations reassess their roles in a sector critical to regional security.

The new consortium, which includes German-based defense electronics firm Hensoldt, Airbus Defence and Space, Autoflug, Diehl Defence, Rohde & Schwarz, Liebherr, MBDA, and MTU Aero Engines, has outlined an alternative plan to replace the failed project. A company representative confirmed that the proposal has been forwarded to German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, with additional copies sent to Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s office. The move comes as a response to the growing rift between the industrial partners, which has complicated the progress of the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) programme.

“We’ve also been in discussions on this for months with various stakeholders,” Pistorius said, highlighting the ongoing efforts to determine the direction of Germany’s defense priorities. The spokesperson added, “The companies have jointly drawn up a position paper on the FCAS and the associated Next Generation Weapon System (NGWS).”

While the FCAS project was initially hailed as a cornerstone of European defense integration, its collapse has raised concerns about the continent’s ability to maintain unified military projects. The programme aimed to develop a next-generation combat air system capable of countering evolving threats, particularly from a more assertive Russia and the United States, which has strained its geopolitical ties. However, internal disagreements have stalled its progress, with France’s Dassault Aviation and Germany’s Airbus Defence and Space at the center of the dispute.

The conflict primarily revolved around Dassault’s push to take greater control over the aircraft’s development, a stance that German partners resisted. Airbus, as the primary industrial collaborator for Germany, had been advocating for a more balanced approach, ensuring all participating nations had equal influence. This struggle over leadership has reportedly delayed critical decision-making and created uncertainty about the future of the FCAS, which was designed to provide Europe with a shared platform for advanced air combat capabilities.

German partners have emphasized their need for a fighter jet tailored to specific operational requirements, such as the ability to carry nuclear weapons or operate from aircraft carriers. Chancellor Merz has argued that Germany’s strategic needs differ from France’s, particularly in terms of mobility and versatility. This divergence in priorities has underscored the challenges of aligning national interests within a transnational defense programme, despite the shared goal of reducing reliance on foreign suppliers.

“Pistorius said Berlin was assessing ‘which direction we take.’ The collapse of the original Franco-German project had ‘pained’ him, as he acknowledged the importance of the partnership for European defense cohesion. ‘Ultimately, you have to draw a line between head and heart,’ he added, reflecting the emotional and strategic trade-offs involved.”

The new proposal, which was unveiled just a day after the project’s termination, seeks to address these concerns by redefining the FCAS framework. Hensoldt’s involvement signals a renewed focus on integrating advanced sensor and communication technologies, a key component of modern fighter jet capabilities. The consortium aims to streamline decision-making while retaining the core objectives of the original programme, which included developing a high-tech, multi-role aircraft to modernize Europe’s air forces.

Details of the alternative plan are expected to be revealed during an announcement at the Berlin ILA Air Show on Thursday. This event will provide a platform for the industry partners to present their vision and seek broader support from the European defense community. Analysts suggest the proposal may prioritize agility and cost-efficiency, catering to Germany’s immediate needs while maintaining the FCAS’s long-term goals.

The German defence ministry has confirmed the existence of the new proposal, which has sparked renewed optimism among some stakeholders. While the failure of the Franco-German project has been a setback, it has also created an opportunity for other European nations to contribute to the development of a unified combat air system. Countries such as Spain, which has been a key partner in the FCAS, may now play a more prominent role in shaping the next phase of the initiative.

Industry experts note that the alternative plan could lead to a more decentralized approach, allowing each participating nation to customize its contributions. This strategy may help mitigate past conflicts by ensuring clearer responsibilities and avoiding overlapping mandates. However, it also raises questions about the long-term cohesion of the FCAS programme, which was meant to serve as a flagship project for European defense innovation.

As the German government reviews the proposal, the focus will remain on balancing national interests with collective goals. The decision could have far-reaching implications for Europe’s military capabilities, potentially reshaping the landscape of joint defense ventures. With the upcoming announcement, the consortium hopes to demonstrate that a new path is not only feasible but essential for the continent’s security future.

The collapse of the original Franco-German project highlights the complexities of cross-border collaboration in defense manufacturing. While the partnership was ambitious, it struggled to reconcile differing strategic visions and technical priorities. The new consortium’s alternative plan may offer a more flexible solution, but its success will depend on the willingness of all involved parties to align their objectives. For now, the focus is on preparing for the Berlin ILA Air Show, where the details of this potential shift will be unveiled to a global audience.

Kremlin-backed artist uses AI deepfakes and stirs controversy

Kremlin-affiliated artist leverages AI deepfakes, ignites debate

The Artist’s Background

Kremlin backed artist uses AI deepfakes – Yaroslav Dronov, a 34-year-old Russian singer known by his stage name Shaman, has become a focal point of controversy through his recent use of artificial intelligence technology. Before gaining attention for his AI-driven projects, Dronov was a participant in popular Russian music competitions such as *The X Factor* and *The Voice*. His career has been closely aligned with the Kremlin’s narrative, as he openly advocates for Russia’s actions in Ukraine and frequently performs at government-organized events. In 2025, he took part in *Intervision 2025*, an alternative to Eurovision orchestrated by President Vladimir Putin to promote traditional values. His performances in North Korea, including a notable appearance in Pyongyang that same year, further underscore his commitment to Russian geopolitical initiatives.

The Controversial Music Video

Dronov’s latest project, a music video titled *“Mother Russia”* (*Rossiya – Mama*), has drawn significant public attention. The video features AI-generated deepfakes of Russian public figures who have fled the country following the invasion of Ukraine. While not every individual labeled as a “foreign agent” by the Russian government appears in the clip, several high-profile names are included: comedian Maxim Galkin, rappers Noize MC and Morgenshtern, journalist Yury Dud, businessmen Oleg Tinkov and Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and political scientist Ekaterina Schulmann. The piece opens with these figures’ portraits pinned to a board, before their AI-altered images harmonize in a synchronized choir, singing the song.

A disclaimer in the video explicitly notes the use of AI-generated content, but the artistic choice has sparked mixed responses. Dronov shared his reasoning on VK, Russia’s largest social media platform, stating,

“While they [‘foreign agents’] perform for money against Russia, in my music video they sing for Russia free of charge.”

This statement frames the deepfakes as a form of patriotic contribution, rather than a political attack.

Public Reactions and Omissions

The individuals depicted in the video have expressed a range of opinions. Some have criticized the use of their old photographs, feeling it undermines their personal autonomy. Others, however, view the exposure as beneficial for their public profiles. Blogger Ilya Varlamov, for instance, remarked that Dronov is “one of theirs” and highlighted his support for the LGBTQIA+ community, suggesting the deepfakes could serve as a strategic move to reintroduce these figures to Russian audiences. Varlamov also questioned the effectiveness of the AI project in maintaining the public’s trust.

One notable absence from the video is Monetochka, whose real name is Yelizaveta Gyrdymova. Designated a “foreign agent” by Russia’s Ministry of Justice, she resides in Lithuania and faces legal consequences for allegedly evading her duties. Dronov’s decision to exclude her from the deepfake choir has prompted disappointment, with Gyrdymova herself expressing regret over the omission. This exclusion has raised questions about the artist’s criteria for selecting participants and whether it reflects a broader political bias.

Legal Implications and Criticisms

The controversy has extended into legal discussions, with experts debating the validity of claims against Dronov for unauthorized image use. Under Russian law, individuals can pursue lawsuits if they believe their likenesses have been exploited without consent. However, critics argue that the artist’s strong ties to the government may complicate legal action. Some commentators have suggested that the deepfakes are a calculated effort to align with Kremlin interests, making it less likely that the subjects would win a case.

Dronov has defended his actions, asserting,

“I do not have the right to conceal this betrayal,”

and stating that he will “be lit up with the truth like a Kremlin star.” His rhetoric positions the deepfakes as a necessary act of defiance against critics who accuse him of hypocrisy. The artist’s bold approach has reignited debates about the ethical boundaries of AI in art, particularly in politically charged contexts.

Broader Context of AI Regulation

As nations grapple with AI’s role in shaping media and art, Dronov’s work stands in contrast to efforts aimed at curbing its misuse. While countries like the EU, Canada, and Australia have imposed sanctions on artists linked to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Dronov’s use of AI deepfakes highlights a different strategy: blending technology with propaganda to amplify messages. His music video, released in 2026, serves as both a creative statement and a political tool, leveraging the medium to reach audiences beyond traditional media.

The project also reflects the growing accessibility of AI tools, which enable individuals to manipulate images and voices with relative ease. Critics argue that this democratization of deepfake technology poses challenges for accountability, as it allows creators to bypass conventional verification processes. Dronov’s video, with its clear artistic intent and inclusion of disclaimers, represents a middle ground between innovation and transparency, yet it continues to divide opinions.

International Reactions and Media Coverage

Reactions to Dronov’s work have been amplified by international media and public discourse. The video’s provocative nature has led to discussions about its potential impact on public perception, particularly in regions that view Russia’s actions in Ukraine with skepticism. While some see the deepfakes as a powerful way to highlight the cultural influence of Russian figures abroad, others question whether the artist’s alignment with the Kremlin compromises the authenticity of his art.

Legal experts remain divided on the matter. Some emphasize that Russian law provides a framework for addressing AI-related disputes, while others stress the difficulty of proving intent in cases where the technology is used creatively. The absence of an official lawsuit as of publication suggests that the legal battle may not be immediate, but the debate over AI’s role in political messaging is far from over.

Legacy of the Deepfake Project

Dronov’s *Mother Russia* video has become a symbol of the evolving intersection between art, technology, and politics. By incorporating AI deepfakes, he challenges traditional notions of authorship and authenticity, prompting audiences to consider the implications of digital manipulation. The project’s success in capturing attention underscores the potential of AI to reshape narratives, even as it raises concerns about consent and control.

As the controversy surrounding the video continues, it serves as a case study in the use of AI for ideological purposes. Whether viewed as a bold artistic statement or a calculated political maneuver, Dronov’s work exemplifies how technology can be wielded to reinforce national identity in an era of digital transformation. The debate over his methods is likely to persist, shaping how AI is perceived in the years to come.