UsageVPN
Fast mobile article powered by Nexiamath-SEO AMP.
AMP Article

EU must act before China cripples European industries, warns EPP chief

Published June 8, 2026 · Updated June 8, 2026 · By David Martin

EU-China Trade Tensions Intensify as Leaders Push for Economic Reforms

EU must act before China cripples - As the EU prepares for its summit on June 18, mounting concerns over China's economic influence are prompting calls for a reevaluation of trade strategies. Manfred Weber, the head of the European People's Party (EPP) in the European Parliament, has issued a stark warning that Europe must act decisively to prevent China from undermining its industrial sectors. His remarks, published in an interview with Bild am Sonntag, underscore the urgency of the situation, emphasizing that the time of complacency has passed.

The End of a Passive Approach

According to Weber, the EU needs to adopt a more assertive stance toward China. "We can no longer afford to be passive in our dealings with Beijing," he stated. The leader of the EPP argued that the bloc must protect its economic interests through consistent and clear policies, while simultaneously renegotiating the terms of its relationship with the Asian giant. This shift, he suggested, is essential to ensure that European industries are not left vulnerable to aggressive Chinese competition.

“Europe faces a critical juncture in its trade strategy with China. The era of naivety is over,” said Weber, stressing the need for a reset in economic relations. His remarks highlight a growing consensus among EU leaders that the current framework is insufficient to address the challenges posed by China's expanding market dominance.

Member States Demand Stronger Measures

Several EU nations, with France at the forefront, have been advocating for a more robust response to China's trade practices. Their concerns center around the country's overproduction and the influx of low-cost exports, which they argue are weakening Europe's already delicate economic position. Analysts and media outlets have also amplified these warnings, suggesting that a trade war between the EU and China is on the horizon.

Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, has long sounded the alarm about the EU's reliance on China. Her concerns were first raised over three years ago, when she addressed the growing risks of an imbalanced trade relationship. "We can expect to see a clear path and push to make China less dependent on the world and the world more dependent on China," she stated in March 2023. This statement reflected her belief that the EU must prioritize security and control over the traditional principles of free markets and open trade.

Recent Developments Signal a Turning Point

On May 29, the European Commission released a press statement reinforcing the idea that the current trade and investment relationship with China is unsustainable. This declaration came after a meeting between EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič and his Chinese counterpart, trade envoy Li Chenggang, in Paris. Šefčovič told journalists that EU and Chinese authorities are committed to deeper dialogue to address the growing trade deficit.

“The current state of the trade and investment relationship is not sustainable,” the Commission noted. Šefčovič added that the EU aims to resolve the issue of “what is becoming an unsustainable trade deficit with China” through enhanced negotiations and strategic adjustments.

The Cost of Inaction

Manfred Weber has been particularly vocal about the economic toll of inaction, citing a daily trade deficit of nearly one billion euros as a clear indicator of the problem. He argued that this imbalance is threatening Europe's industrial foundation and high-quality employment opportunities. "Either we fight back, or China will cripple parts of our industry," he said, urging the EU to use its trade policy tools with boldness.

As an example, Weber pointed to the imposition of EU tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. He suggested that this policy could be expanded to other sectors, demonstrating the potential for more comprehensive measures. Additionally, he criticized the use of EU funds to support projects that indirectly benefit Chinese firms. A recent case involved EU-backed development aid used to purchase 380 natural gas buses for Senegal, where a Chinese bid outcompeted a European alternative. Weber insisted that such outcomes must not recur, emphasizing that European development aid should adhere strictly to European standards.

“European development aid funded by taxpayers must not benefit Chinese companies,” Weber stated. He further claimed that in the future, "anyone wishing to sell in Europe must play by European rules," underscoring his demand for fairness in global trade.

Potential Retaliation and Economic Risks

Despite the EU's push for reform, a harder line against China could lead to retaliatory actions. Beijing might restrict exports of critical materials like rare earths, which are vital for manufacturing in Germany and other industrial hubs. This could create significant challenges for European producers reliant on these resources. While trade agreements with partners such as Canada, Mercosur countries, and India may help mitigate some of the damage, they may not fully counteract the impact of a China-EU trade conflict.

Weber, however, remains confident in the EU's position. He argues that Europe still holds considerable leverage, particularly due to China's dependence on the EU's single market. "China needs us," he said, asserting that this dependency should be leveraged to secure fairer trading conditions. His comments reflect a broader sentiment that the EU has the means to enforce its economic priorities, even in the face of resistance from Beijing.

A Path Forward for European Industry

With the summit approaching, the debate over EU-China trade relations is intensifying. Leaders are divided between those who advocate for immediate action and those who prefer a more gradual approach. However, the consensus is clear: the EU cannot afford to remain passive as China continues to expand its economic footprint. The goal is to create a framework that protects European industries while maintaining access to global markets.

As the discussion unfolds, the focus will likely shift toward concrete policy proposals. From trade tariffs to regulatory adjustments, the EU is expected to outline its strategy for countering Chinese dominance. The outcome of these discussions will be crucial in determining the future of European manufacturing and the balance of economic power between the bloc and its largest trade partner. For now, the message is consistent: Europe must act swiftly to safeguard its interests before it's too late.